What's wrong with the face? It's 10x better than any other male archers i've seen. It gives the archer personality, all I see that needs work are the arrows. 4.5/5.
Face looks awesome, it fits a genre, sure I wouldn't want a face like that on me but it looks sweet for the game and fits something from the medieval ages. Crossbow is sweet! The only thing that needs work is the arrows in the quiver...nonetheless 5/5
The first thing you always have to ask yourself when you see a model is "Will I use this one?". This time, the answer isn't always positive. I mean, sure, a male archer, great, BUT, it has some really big errors...for example, the arrows look very bad, and his face looks just plain retarded. Otherwise, it's quite passable. I wouldn't ever think of using it in any of my maps, but, what do you know? There are probably people out there who will.
lol, yes, they fire Bolts. but Bolts were kept in quivers aswell, until the Early magazine was designed for "rapid" fire crosbows. nice model, cant really think were I could use it but still good over all 4.7/5
The mustarch ( english is not my first tongue ) looks retarded and the end of the arrows looks abit weird but overall, it is nice. Skin needs abit of fixing, 4/5
But if you don't look at these aspects its a good model 3/%
