Warcraft III resources & community, 2003–2006 · archived

startrek_worbee.mdx

not rated
Submitted by BlackSebastianUnits - Miscellanous103 downloads35 KB
i know, it looks only a bit like the original Workbee from Star Trek. But you can use it as an other spaceship or somtihng like that. I think it could be a good train.^^
Model
Workbee
Polycount
52
Textures
1
  • Skin 1 workbee.blp
Animations
5
  • Anim 1 Stand - 1
  • Anim 2 Stand - 2
  • Anim 3 Walk
  • Anim 4 Work
  • Anim 5 Death
Cameras
1
  • Camera 1 Camera01
Download

Comments

8
http://www.thedigitalbits.com/articles/trekevent/workbee.jpg
Thats what it should look like.
True. Your criticism may sometimes be harsh but often true, and you seem to say it as it is instead of saying "OMFG UR SKIN SUX0RZ!!" without any valid reason why it sucks. Okay, then. Point taken.
I take back what I said on the cryptfiend statue olof. You ARE turning into an elitist.
For the model: The skin DOES need a bit of work, you know, shading and such, and the model needs to have a "portrait" animation so that the camera doesn't show random animations of the unit whenever you select it, and it also needs more detail. It looks like a wedge of cheese. (mm...cheese...)

I am what I am, I am the same olof as the one that joined this site more then a year ago, I am only more experienced now. You can like it or not, it doesn't really matter

Skin needs work yes. Butif you down load it and look at the animations, they are prety good. Could add a few particle emiters, and I could help with the skin. I believe this should not get deleted, but submit a better skin.

And Olof,why are you always disdanful of noob's attempts to become part of the comunity. they try their best, but you do is tell them how bad their atempts are. At least i try and be nice when I tell some one their model/skin/map/spell is crap.
Sorry if I sounded ranty.

the yellow part of the skin hass not lighting at all, that means no effort, if it had lighting but not good lighting, then the person atleast tries, this skin has no lighting

But the rest of the model looks fine...
I take back what I said on the cryptfiend statue olof. You ARE turning into an elitist. :x
For the model: The skin DOES need a bit of work, you know, shading and such, and the model needs to have a "portrait" animation so that the camera doesn't show random animations of the unit whenever you select it, and it also needs more detail. It looks like a wedge of cheese. (mm...cheese...)
Skin needs work yes. Butif you down load it and look at the animations, they are prety good. Could add a few particle emiters, and I could help with the skin. I believe this should not get deleted, but submit a better skin.

And Olof,why are you always disdanful of noob's attempts to become part of the comunity. they try their best, but you do is tell them how bad their atempts are. At least i try and be nice when I tell some one their model/skin/map/spell is crap.

Sorry if I sounded ranty.
Very bad skin.
-No shading.
-Bad Coloring.
-The window looks corny.
Blocky model.
-52 polys on a unit?
-Looks like an extended square.
Bad Portrait.
-Camera's off.
-By a lot.
1/5.
I smell a much needed delete... Remake this and resubmit when it is actually fit to be on this website.
--donut3.5--
Horrible skin with almost no detail or propper shading and lighting.
It doesn't even look like a 'star-trek' model.