Very well that is your opinion. My opinion is that every model should have a portrait. I'm a mapmaker and I want things to look good. People look at the portrait more than the actual model anyway; or is that just me? Anyway its just a matter of opinion and people shouldn't loose a night's sleep over it because someone else thinks differently.
TelefraggedI'm sorry, but that's plain lazy. They've done their part of the deal; making a model, you should do the rest, if not, just request it from the maker... they may change their mind.
No, They did not finish their part of the deal; models are suppose to have portraits. They are the lazy ones; it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to add a camera (heck I can do it).
TelefraggedIf you applied this kind of concept to chain spells, wouldn't you have to change the spell from one to another? Would you dock a point for that?
I would not apply this to spells because it is the downloader's job to adjust it for his map due to the fact that all maps are different. Models on the other hand don't affect game play.
UrlockThey are the lazy ones; it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to add a camera (heck I can do it.
If you can do it, then why are they the lazy ones? It takes them probably several hours, maybe a couple days to make a model. It takes 5 or 10 minutes to add a camera to a unit. I think you're the lazy one if you can't do that.
Of course, it takes even less time to take a look at what in-game model the new one resembles and change the path so it takes advantage of the properly made one.
Interesting thought, who adds the camera? The maker or the modeler? I say the modeler, your model you add the camera. Besides, do these molders use there models in their own maps? Seriously, if its so easy, which it is and I can do it, why don't they take the extra 5 to 10 minutes to add it?