And the another question: how much jass-enchanced spell must be? For example, I make trigger lightning spell for easy balancing I make it like a custom function - and call it from GUI trigger. Can I do so?
Hmm... if I'll join then I'll join, if i don't then don't. In my opinion you should delete sections that Arcane C. used. Debuff = Curse and so. And have you thought about Armour or Orb section???
JacekHmm... if I'll join then I'll join, if i don't then don't. In my opinion you should delete sections that Arcane C. used. Debuff = Curse and so. And have you thought about Armour or Orb section???
I was actually the one who said that Daelin should add a debuff category, and orbs will go to passive while armour is passive too, if the spell is passive, else misc.
Blade.dk2I was actually the one who said that Daelin should add a debuff category.
And this sounds as if I would've done that at your order Blade.dk2. I think you actually suggested that I should such a section, and I accepted it. I didn't do it because you told me to! I did it because I liked the idea. Keep in mind that I'm not doing something because you tell me to, as if it would be an order! You already had this attitude with the results as well... And you have the feeling that I hurried with the results at your demand. Not at all blade.dk2, not at all. I finished then because I felt so.
And no, I wouldn't have anything with you adding similar sections with the Arcane Competition, if that would be your impression now.
Blade.dk2I was actually the one who said that Daelin should add a debuff category.
And this sounds as if I would've done that at your order Blade.dk2. I think you actually suggested that I should such a section, and I accepted it. I didn't do it because you told me to! I did it because I liked the idea. Keep in mind that I'm not doing something because you tell me to, as if it would be an order! You already had this attitude with the results as well... And you have the feeling that I hurried with the results at your demand. Not at all blade.dk2, not at all. I finished then because I felt so.
And no, I wouldn't have anything with you adding similar sections with the Arcane Competition, if that would be your impression now.
~Daelin
Sorry Daelin, I'm not an english champ, I don't think you do what I say, not at all, I were just upset, I can't see why Jacek didn't like that section added, sorry for my damned sucky expression, indeed I'm sorry.
My apologies, really, you're a cool guy, and I didn't want to offend you.
Sorry
Blade (really gotta improve my english, it's not first time people misunderstood me)
Daminon... it would be pathetic to ask someone else to do your spells, don't you think?
Hehe, and to be honest, I didn't really check that for the Arcane Competition, since I kinda trusted you that if I say don't, you won't. On the other hand, I added the "Implementation" stuff and I expected everyone to get 10/10 there, but it seems that many ignored that. So that you can see how careful are people with the rules...
I didn't suspect it to be allowed but since it was never written in the first post I asked. And I wasn't pointing to that someone would ask someone else to completly make his spell. I was more pointing to if you ask about like "what is wrong here in my spell?".
When you set the points for eye candy, will you go after how the spell looks when you cast i unchaged or will go after what effects you can do by just changing some variables?
An example: A Nova spell with following optiond: - Number of missiles - Angle increasment. Gives the possibility to make the missiles spiral around. - Missile speed. - Trail. An effect is periodcly spawned at the missiles. With these options a user can make the spell look pretty good but lets say that the creator set these vaules so that it doesn't look good.
I mean will you set points from how it looks unmodifyed or from how many options there are to manipualte the effects without changing the code.