New feature: "Downvoter List"

ok, a downvoter list for the "1"-voters is good and nice, but whats about ppl who alwas vote a 2? they are still not on that list , and theyre downvoters too

Vexorian: How would you feel if you were on that list that wouldnt be so nice and every one can see the list PM you message that you a asshole and whatever you know what i mean

LubbeVexorian: How would you feel if you were on that list that wouldnt be so nice and every one can see the list PM you message that you a asshole and whatever you know what i mean

I would feel dumb, but that's no problem cause I don't rate people's stuff with 1 for no reason

yeah, who gets on that list with more than 5 votes and 100% 1-votes IS a dumb...

if you dont want to be ont hat list: stop downvoting everything! and vote like a normal human, not like a 6 year old kiddie whos proud of his internet connection

I think that it is a good initiative.. But what happens to those no.1 votes they made?? Are they removed.. Last week I posted a post (lol) about a troll in the skin section.. in one day the top 5 changed becasue of 1 no.1 vote each!

Till now that hasn't been fixed. And I really think that should happen.. and NOT only because my skin was no2.. in rating

Anyway I really hope this will somewhat stop those silly childish people!

1 vote of for one is 100% isn't dumb because thats their first choice...
2 is is low but a resource can really deserve a 2

Im sory to say this but some of the top listed items were not very good and were only top listed because of the opposites of downvoters who I beleive are noobs aswell.

people with 60% 5s should also be listed as abusers I beleive I might be on that list...

But Maybe we could also make it so the authors cant vote for their own stuff.

I have over 60% 5's! I usually only vote the good resources so as to give those with bad resources a chance to improve.

I like being able to vote my own resources. However, I usually only use that vote to offset the downvoters.

To properly identify the downvoters (or upvoters), I think that it should be required of anybody who rates a resource to also post a comment. Even if the comment were left blank, the person's name would be recorded for everyone to see. The owner of the resource (or anybody else) could post the person's username on a publically accessable list. This way, an accurate downvoter list could be made.

~The_Raven

But some users may not want to comment a resource

They could jusy write "n/a", but either way, the user's name would be recorded.

~The_Raven

Thats abit dum... you expect the people who rate to say that hmmm

Re: Sopho...

So what u r saying is that if a skin has 11 votes of which 3 4's and 8 5's all those who voted are opposites of downvoters; are NOOBS?!? ?! OMG.. That cannot be what u really meant can it?? It simply means that that particular skin is
a: Liked by many
b: useable for many
c: A good skin!

Maybe u don't like it but apparently many others do!.. Ok if the skin is rated a 5 by 10 just newly created accounts.. Yes that must ring a bell! But if the skin is rated 5's by many regular visitors.. .. better not call them noobs!

Anyway those skins suddenly got 1 or 2 times rated a 1.. thus dropping dramatically in the 'ladder'. U can't tell me that is perfectly normal!

I'm talking about several skins and 2 in particular.. Those 2 only got appraisels like: Heavenly; Bravo; Jeezus of CNP; WOW.. etc etc...

No
I'm saying users don't have to comment when rating and should only have a list for ones, not twos

lol i did 5 times a 5
..............4 times a 4
..............3 times a 3
..............2 times a 2
..............1 times a 1

Lol, nice. Though most of the 1 votes were given to absolutely crap uploads that were removed soon from the downloads. I only give a 1 if its a upload that is absolutely shit. Call me whatever you want anyways, thats how I tend to vote. The only thing that might be a taddifferent is that I usually dont bother with giving a 5 to good models, as I know that they are good and therefore i usually do not bother with giving it a vote (only rarely)